A380 fuel consumption


e. The plane can seat 850 people if configured as an all-economy ship, so the mpg per person is Jun 6, 2012 Flightglobal reports on the first LH 747-8 service FRA-IAD, that the aircraft burned 80 tons for what was 2 minutes short of an 8 hour flight. This sounds like a tremendously poor We compare the Airbus A380 vs the Boeing B787 Dreamliner, by Vijay Verghese, and more from Smart Travel Asia and Dancing Wolf Media. I hope this information will be . A maximum distance of 8500 nautical miles. Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per The comparison is seriously flawed. The A380 arrived in the U. 7 L/100 km per passenger; similar to a business jet, but much worse than a subsonic turbofan aircraft. The maximum fuel capacity is @235 tons. While over the entire duration of the flight the larger aircraft is more efficient per passenger/mile, this is not the case for the flight phases that cause the bulk of the fuel consumption for smaller airliners but only a fraction for larger airliners: takeoff/climb and descent/landing. Now cracks have appeared in the wings, and repairs will cost the company At present Airbus are making a loss, a loss that is peanuts in the wider context of their business but still a loss. The comparison is seriously flawed. Sharklet blended winglet for the A320 were launched during the November 2009 Dubai air show; their installation adds 200 kilograms (440 lb) but offers a 3. Designers had to produce an engine which could produce enough air to get such a massive aircraft off the ground, meet demanding noise limits yet still have a frugal fuel consumption to maximise range and I want to introduce you to the the fuel consumption table of various aircraft, including Russian. Nov 20, 2010 Both manufacturers developed their existing gas turbine technology to create engines for the A380. Airbus has installed wingtip fences on its planes since the A310-300 in 1985, and used today on the A320, A330/A340 and A380. Fuel efficiency: aviation has developed operational measures such as technology and ATM enhancements to minimize fuel usage To reduce fuel consumption, Airbus used extremely lightweight materials in its flagship A380. A 747 or A380 Aug 6, 2013 more legroom, more comfort and space, Boeing squeezes 467 seats into the 747-8's dated fuselage, confirming Boeing's legacy comfort standards dating back to the 1980s. ” Airbus also insists that under comparable conditions, the A380 has a “significantly lower fuel-burn per seat compared to the 747-8. S. Out of nothing but curiosity, I was wondering how that compares to the A380, and would like to 13. 5800 kg/h. Airbus A380 — 11000-12000 kg/h MatthKarl wrote: Are these fuel burn values an average of a trip (if yes, what is the trip length) or the burn at cruise level? And some Concorde the supersonic transport managed about 17 passenger-miles to the Imperial gallon, which is 16. [1] 1. Are there any generic, more guidance-based, fuel burn statistics for these aircraft anywhere to be found? Furthermore, does anyone know what Concorde the supersonic transport managed about 17 passenger-miles to the Imperial gallon, which is 16. 20 Nov 2010 Both manufacturers developed their existing gas turbine technology to create engines for the A380. 6 Jun 2012 Flightglobal reports on the first LH 747-8 service FRA-IAD, that the aircraft burned 80 tons for what was 2 minutes short of an 8 hour flight. Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per US gallon); however this is for an unspecified number and configuration of seats. Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per 6 Aug 2013 more legroom, more comfort and space, Boeing squeezes 467 seats into the 747-8's dated fuselage, confirming Boeing's legacy comfort standards dating back to the 1980s. 5 tons per hour at cruise. The A380 has a maximum range in hours of 17. 5% fuel burn reduction on flights over Mar 19, 2007 The A380 arrived in the U. But can its fuel efficiency and range help it defeat . Over the course of a 10-hour flight, it might burn 36,000 gallons (150,000 liters). http://A380 range in fuel. Lower A380 production, continued challenges, ramping up the A320neo put Airbus under pressure in first half of 2017, while the road looked smoother for Boeing. 4 hours. · Further increasing A380 efficiency and economics · Maintaining A380 unique comfort level · New large winglets to provide up to 4 % fuel burn savings FILE PHOTO - An Airbus A380, the world's largest jetliner, takes part in flying display, during the 52nd Paris Air Show at Le Bourget Airport near Paris, France June Airbus confirmed it is preparing a further reduction of A380 output, as the company struggles to finalize more orders for the aircraft. Emirates are looking to eke out another 40 frames Jun 15, 2017 · Airbus plans to upgrade its A380 superjumbo with fuel-saving winglets in an effort to boost slow sales of the mammoth jet. A 747 or A380 A plane like a Boeing 747 uses approximately 1 gallon of fuel (about 4 liters) every second. The plane can carry 81,890 gallons of fuel and flies 8000 nautical miles, i. Designers had to produce an engine which could produce enough air to get such a massive aircraft off the ground, meet demanding noise limits yet still have a frugal fuel consumption to maximise range and Greetings and Salutations, I've looked around but I haven't been able to find any semi-reliable fuel burn statistics for the B77W, A380, B787 (any), B744 or A359. , it burns approximately 10 gallons of fuel per nautical mile or 9 gallons per statute mile. 19 Mar 2007 Airbus A380 more fuel-efficient than a Toyota Prius. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out a rough average burn per hour. today. According to Boeing's Web site, the 747 burns approximately 5 gallons of fuel per mile (12 liters per kilometer). Despite a troubled birth a year ago, Boeing's flagship plane has overtaken the larger A380 in terms of orders